The Myth of Post-secondary Education

If you live in North America you are probably aware of the overwhelming desire among pretty much any parent you meet, see, or hear about to “send their kids to college”. [note: the word “college” has slightly different meanings on either side of the 49th parallel, but I’ll stick with the American usage as it’s less of a mouthful than “university and/or college”] Savings programs start when the baby is still in the womb, parents agonize over how they will pay for college. They spend years bullying, coercing, manipulating, pleading, and haranguing their children to “do well in school so you can go to college”. The message these days is pretty clear: All good parents want their kids to go to college. The underlying message is equally clear: if your kid doesn’t go to college they will not be successful or happy (words which seem to be intertwined in our culture); they will live meaningless lives of subservience.

Well, I’m here to say that this is actually quite a load of propaganda and, once again, I’m amazed at how readily parents in our culture just eat up mainstream advice on how to raise their children without being able to critically examine the idea (oh, but they don’t teach critical thinking in the school system: coincidence? I think not). And I feel I’m particularly qualified to stand firmly on this side of the fence because I personally spent 12 years at University, earned three degrees (BSc, MSc, PhD), and pretty much loved every minute of it. I now teach university students (albeit on a very part-time basis). I’m not a “college-hater”, I’m not a bitter drop-out. I just don’t think it is for everybody, and I think the reasons why parents worry so much about it are based on a lot of false assumptions and information.

I spent 8 years as a graduate student. When I began grad school I wanted to work in the pharmaceutical industry. At that time a Master’s degree was not cutting it anymore as a means to getting on the Senior Scientist career ladder; there were too many people out there with MSc’s competing for too few jobs so if you had a PhD that gave you an edge. So I continued on to complete my PhD. By the time I’d done that a PhD was no longer cutting it. The market was flooded with PhD’s and now companies were asking for two years of post-doctoral experience. This requires one to get a position as a post-doctoral fellow, which is essentially working as a research scientist but for crappy pay (I well recall the border guards interviewing me as I entered the US to go work at a prestigious laboratory in Cleveland: they doubted that I met the requirements for my visa, claiming I couldn’t possibly be a “professional” because my salary showed me to be making less than they themselves earned).

So reason #1 that not every parent should send their kid to college is that if everybody has a college degree then its value becomes diluted and soon it doesn’t open that many doors anymore.

Parents have been suckered into believing that learning can only take place in institutions. College has become, for them, just another school that children must go to in order to learn what they need to know to get a decent job. The truth is that in pretty much any profession, real-life skill counts for more than a piece of paper. This is especially true in business, where many of the world’s greatest business successes did not get college degrees and many didn’t even complete high school. Any business worth its salt would rather hire young people who’ve already had real-life business experience, either by starting their own business(es) or working out in the real world in positions that allow for growth and/or are outcome-based (thus giving the job applicant a set of accomplishments or achievements from Real Life to show their potential employer).

So another reason for not putting your child through college is to allow them to go out in the Real World (which they’ve been sheltered from for the last 12 – 15 years), gain some experience, mature, and figure out who they are and what they really want to do. Putting them in yet another institution only stunts their personal growth and prevents them from figuring out these things while they still have few responsibilities to other people.

Yes, there are some professions that require certification. Lawyers, doctors, dentists, nurses to name a few. Frankly I think that whole system is a crock. I have mentored dozens of students, both high school and undergraduate, in research laboratories and those kids come out knowing far more about the science of what they were doing than years in a classroom could teach. It was real information, in a real context, the results of which they could see and feel every day (wanna really understand the role calcium plays in cardiac contractility? watch what happens the day you forget to add it to your isolated heart perfusate!). I would bet anybody any amount of money that in the 4 years it takes to churn out a B.Sc degree (which won’t get you a job past “dishwasher” in any laboratory) I could produce a fully capable research scientist (with the caveat that the subject has to be passionate about, or at least highly interested in, science). In the department where I teach, the third and fourth years of undergraduate study are separated by a year of fellowship work in a real laboratory. I’ve taught the same students before and after their year in the Real World and the differences are striking. When setting up labs the running joke is “oh, they’re fourth years, we can go for coffee” because those kids are already so capable. The third-years need their hands held and things spelled out for them every step of the way. They are helpless without someone telling them what to do.

So, even though our society is set up so that certain professions require university certification the reality is that anybody who is passionate about a subject and is given the opportunity to gain hands-on experience actually doing that job under a good mentor, could do as well (and likely far better) than the still-wet-behind-the-ears graduate waving their degree. Mentorship is the way to go but that doesn’t support the massive industry that we call college education. It also doesn’t allow society to suck parents into investing and saving money for college fees (supporting oodles of money managers and college savings funds/schemes) rather than using it for something really useful. College is a business and its in the interest of society to guilt parents into thinking that if they can’t send their kid to college they have miserably failed them.

Many parents are so sold on the idea of a college education that their kids actually don’t have any say in the matter. The parents decide the kids are going to college, or else, and that’s that. I can’t imagine a bigger waste of time and money than sending a child to college who doesn’t want to be there. Unfortunately, most schooled children have – at age 18 – been completely infantilized by 12+ years of institutionalization, so they don’t generally know what they would like to do, what their passions are, and how to accomplish goals set by their own selves rather than someone else’s agenda. So not sending them to college may not result in them accomplishing anything until they’ve had a few years to find their own answers, but given the price of a college education you could afford to support that child at home while they took the time to figure things out, and still present them with a chunk of seed money for whatever they end up deciding upon.

On the other hand, you may have a child who is fortunate enough to have clear goals for themselves and a clear understanding of what they want to do. Perhaps your child has not bought into the promise of consumerism that more money = more things = happiness.

Being a doctor or lawyer is the stereotypical “first choice” of parents; the one that produces the most bragging rights. The one that if spurned for say, art school, is brought up as the sensible choice. And is this because we live in a society simply packed with altruistic citizens? No, this is not the modern-day equivalent of bragging that you have a son joining the priesthood. This has to do with money, baby, and the (mistaken) belief that all doctors and lawyers make a bundle. The good old family doctor doesn’t make much more than a union worker. Lawyers who don’t want to enslave themselves to a massive firm and commit to 120 hour workweeks, those who actually want to help the common person, well they don’t make very much either. When I look across the sea of faces in my classes, 95% of whom are heading to medical school, I wonder how many of them really *want* to be a doctor, why they want to, and what sort of life they envision for themselves (forget being home for dinner, seeing your children grow up, or spending quality time with your spouse). What I cynically wonder is: for whom are you doing this? Is it really for you?

The myths of College include: money= happiness, jobs that pay lots of money can only be had by going to college, if you don’t go to college you are doomed to flip burgers for the rest of your life, responsible citizens hold down full-time jobs and spend money to boost the economy, the only thing worse than being a college dropout is not making it to college in the first place, and of course the one that really irks me – all good parents want their kids to go to college.

Well, I loved university. And if any of my children want to go I’ll be happy to support them in any way I can. But I will support them in whatever they wish to do whether that is bum around Europe in between working at McJobs to save up for said bumming around Europe, creating art, writing poetry, playing music, becoming an athlete, volunteering with non-profit organizations or whatever else floats their boat. After spending their youth directing their own educations, finding their passions, seeing how the Real World actually works, trying out all sorts of jobs and paths before failure really matters, and figuring out who they are and what makes them happy…I have no doubts that whatever paths my children choose they will be successful. In the meantime, I’ll continue to amuse myself by announcing out loud in groups of mainstream parents who don’t really know me that I could care less if my kids go to college and I’m certainly not going to use money that could pay down my mortgage for some savings scheme to that effect.

This article was inspired by a blog post on Home Learning Victoria about an article called Seven Reasons Not to Send Your Kids to College.

Advertisements
Categories: natural learning, parenting, Uncategorized | 8 Comments

Post navigation

8 thoughts on “The Myth of Post-secondary Education

  1. Super Dave Osborne

    If the foundations of Capitalism and Free Markets are actually correct, there should be no quality-of-life advantage derived from going to college, as whatever material gains accrue must be offset by the cost of acquiring the credential.

    Or put another way, if Capitalism “works”, we should expect college to result in such a high student debt load as to wipe away any gains in income.

    And this actually appears to be happening…

  2. Brilliant! I so appreciate reading your perspective on this.

    I’ve linked to it from the “High School & Beyond” page on Home Learning Victoria.

    Maybe I’ll be able to borrow it as a guest post some time in the fall??

  3. BTW, my husband’s brilliant sister has a PhD in astrophysics… and after completing her 2 years of post-doc work, has not been able to land the job of her dreams (I suspect she’s being picky, but I also think the market is glutted).

  4. As usual, I am not sure I agree with all of your arguments, however, I do agree university is not for everyone. I also agree that our current system of higher ed= more $$ is just stupid.
    Last night, we were discussing the idea of donations going directly to those who need, ie money sent to help the Brazilian poor goes directly to the Brazilian poor in the form of cash. Someone asked, “what if they use the money on something frivolous” I think the answer is that it is okay. Money is a tool in life and you don’t need to suffer needlessly.
    I also dislike the “American Dream” that the harder you work, the more money you make, the more successful you are. I think we need to start addressing what does success mean?
    I do think that university and secondary schools need to address the brainless lack of critical thinking for our children. I agree that some 1st/2nd year grad students are clueless, others are very capable. If we are going to have an electric society (which the mainstream does live in), we need to have people who can work in this society…
    My one nephew is going to ITTech, a computer trade school in the US. It is too “easy” for some, and “perfect” for others. Personally? It is training him to get a job so he can fund his other interests… Is that a bad thing to hold a job for?

    Rebecca- I work in astrophysics and there are 2 issues here. Your SIL is failing to accept that astronomy involves many compromises in jobs. The old model of get PhD, do a postdoc and then become junior faculty is outdated. Now you have to get your foot in, do your research, promote yourself and decide your goals and reach for them… (sorry for the digression)

  5. Hi Spacemom: I’m not sure she’s “failing to accept” anything as she’s not going for a Jr. faculty type job and I suspect she’s choosing to take some time to re-evaluate her goals. But I do agree that the old way of doing things is outdated.

  6. peg

    Thanks for this article. Most interesting to me is the suggestion to question the premise that “responsible citizens hold down full-time jobs and spend money to boost the economy.” It is rather insidious within our culture and does many different kinds of harm (to the environment, to individuals, to relationships). Bravo for the call out. Thinking critically about this alone can transform someone’s life.

  7. Going to college is a bigger deal in the US than in Australia. We have a technical college (TAFE) which puts kids into apprenticeships, if they don’t want to go through the traditional route of university.

    But there’s definitely a huge lull in our cultural graduates, asking the question, “what do I want to do with the rest of my life?” Parents can think this is just a phase their kids are going through, but if they were honest with their own adolescence, they’d realise they probably didn’t choose what they wanted to do either. We’re often pressured by what we think we want to do, based on years of indoctrination.

    It’s not much of a choice is it?

    I’m hoping society wakes up and realises we’ve lost our imagination. That’s why people inevitably ask the question, “what do I want to do with the rest of my life?” It’s the abyss between your dreams and what the world says you’re capable of doing (ie: can your parents afford to send you to college?)

    I’ve always been a dreamer and even though I’ve put my nose to the grind to get by in the past, it’s not something I want my daughter to aspire to. There isn’t a dollar value on imagination and yet that’s exactly what our world is lacking in. If she can dream it, I will help her make it – that’s what I want to do for the rest of my life. 😉

  8. Mick Thomas

    I work in higher education, in a graduate admissions office, the largest university in the U.S. I agree with everything you say. However the cost for post secondary ed would not be nearly so high if there wasnt such an incredible waste of money in these institutions. Three times the number of administrative exployees are hired to process an application or to register a student, and this is rampant throughout the entire system and all it’s admin functions. Nepotism, chronyism and the buddy system are the driving forces in hiring, promotion, and retention. At my university (from which I am a graduate), this has been going on for a century or better.

    Who really suffer? The taxpayers who subsidise the school, the parents and the students who pay for it all. Who benefits? The high paid vampires from the president on down. The worst part of it all is that they basically blackmail the payers with the myth and threat of young people “losing out” if they dont somhow come up with the fees to pay for this overblown “product”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: